Blair Witch + Monsters + a Budget = Cloverfield
January 19th, 2008 by Stevie-poo
This flick is average at best. Once you get a good look at the monster this allure of the movie goes way down. It’s well acted and well done, but something about it just screams, “blah”. So was the movie overhyped? Or just average on its own? Who knows, but look for this great debate as well as a full review on Splattercast #62…if anyone besides me saw the movie that is.
Filed under: Commentary, Movies, Splattercast
MaT said:
I’m seeing this on monday night
Jeff said:
The wife & I are planning to go to the 9:50 showing tonight.
Jeff said:
Just got back… I’ll hold most of my thoughts for the Splattercast but I will say I liked it a lot and would recommend people check it out in the theater rather than waiting for DVD.
Explodey Jo said:
When I saw the teaser trailer, I couldn’t help but feel that this movie would disappoint. But I will watch it anyway. Looking forward to hearing your views.
Tonybigguns said:
This movie was sooooo bad I will never get those 85 minutes back. I had a headache after 20 minutes took 3 pills and still nothing. The FX were great but the camera movement messed them up. I heard people say it was art sorry that was not art that was just stupid. As the Comic Book Guy would say “WORST MOVIE EVER!!!”.
I second that.
tbg